Supreme Court leans toward Trump plan to end DACA program for nearly 700K undocumented immigrants

USA Today Politics 1 month ago

WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared likely to side with the Trump administration in its effort to end aprogram that lets nearly 700,000 young, undocumented immigrants live and work in the United States without fear of deportation.

During an extended, 80-minute oral argument inside a packed courtroom that included dozens of the threatened immigrants, several conservative justices said the Department of Homeland Security laid out sufficient reasons for its decision to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, program.

Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch acknowledged that the case's "sympathetic facts ... speak to all of us," but he said the large number of people affected and the impact ending DACA would have on employers and entire communities was taken into consideration. 

The court's four liberal justices argued that the decision to end DACA should rise or fall on the administration's tenuous claim that it was illegal, rather than what Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said might be a more legitimate reason: "We don't like DACA, and we're taking responsibility for that."

The court's ruling likely won't be handed down until next spring, when the 2020 presidential election campaign is in full swing. Even if the court allows the program to be rescinded, most DACA recipients will retain the two-year protection until President Donald Trump or his Democratic successor takes the oath of office in January 2021.

Yet the threat of losing their protected status prompted hundreds of DACA recipients to march, ride or fly to Washington for Tuesday's argument and stage demonstrations outside the court. Until now, nearly every federal judge to hear the dispute has sided with the so-called DREAMers, leaving the program intact nationwide.

The Supreme Court's decision last June to hear the case signaled a potential win for the White House, but how it wins would be crucial. If the justices say Trump has the same discretion to end the program that former President Barack Obama had in creating it, the next president just as easily could renew it. If they agree with the Justice Department that it's unlawful, Congress would have to step in.

The question before the justices Tuesday was not whether the Trump administration can wind down the program, which is undisputed. Rather, they were asked to decide if the administration's reason for doing so – that DACA was illegal from the start – was accurate and sufficient.

Obama created the program in 2012 after negotiations with Congress to create a path to citizenship faltered. He later sought to extend similar protections to more than 4 million undocumented parents of citizens or lawful permanent residents, but that was shot down by federal courts.

Texas then threatened to sue over DACA if the Trump administration didn't end it. But when the Department of Homeland Security did so, lawsuits were filed from California to New York and several places in between, and two federal judges blocked the action nationwide.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, based in California and a continuing thorn in Trump's side, ridiculed the effort to deport "blameless and economically productive young people with clean criminal records."

To qualify every two years for DACA, recipients generally must be students, high school graduates or be enrolled or honorably discharged from the military. They cannot have been convicted of a felony, significant misdemeanor, or more than three lesser crimes.

Nearly three dozen legal briefs were submitted on their side by groups representing big business, educators, religious institutions, labor unions, law enforcement and national security groups, along with immigration and civil rights organizations.

Beyond the reprieve the program provides for the DREAMers, the case is important for several legal, policy and political reasons:

• It represents a major separation-of-powers wrestling match between the executive and legislative branches of government. 

• It is the third major immigration battle to reach the court in which the Trump administration has used shifting justifications for its actions. The court ultimately upheld President Donald Trump's travel ban against several majority-Muslim nations last year but blocked his effort this year to put a citizenship question on the 2020 census.

• It advances the Trump administration's effort to dismantle policies put in place by the Obama administration. The president has been unable to do away with the Affordable Care Act's health care protections but was successful in ending the Clean Power Plan, Obama's signature climate change policy.

• A win at the Supreme Court would enable Trump to resume negotiations with Congress by offering to extend DACA in exchange for increased border wall funds. It also would make the program a major issue in the 2020 elections.


Source link
Read also:
CBS News › 1 month ago
The Supreme Court hears arguments Tuesday on the DACA program, which could lead to the deportation of nearly 700,000 young immigrants known as "Dreamers." The program protects undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children, but President Trump...
USA Today › 1 month ago
Undocumented immigrants walked out of the Supreme Court vowing to fight on after justices heard arguments about the legality of the Trump administration's decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals - or DACA - program. (Nov. 12)
Fox News › Politics › 1 month ago
The future of the DACA program for young illegal immigrants remained uncertain, as the Supreme Court on Tuesday appeared to lack consensus on whether the Trump administration's plans to rescind legal protections for so-called Dreamers were proper.
Fox News › Politics › 1 month ago
The long-running battle over the Trump administration’s bid to end the Obama-era program for young undocumented immigrants known as “Dreamers” will land before the Supreme Court on Tuesday.
USA Today › Politics › 1 month ago
The high court has the fate of nearly 700,000 young immigrants in its hands as it considers the Trump administration plan to end an Obama-era program.
Newsweek › 1 month ago
Nearly half of Republican-leaning Americans said they would like to see a legal pathway for undocumented immigrants to remain in the U.S.
CBS News › 2 months ago
Top executives at Apple - including CEO Tim Cook - have written a brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to block the Trump administration from terminating the DACA program, an Obama-era policy that has shielded hundreds of thousands of young undocumented...
ABC News › 1 month ago
Immigrants from Korea, Mexico and Ghana share their experiences as undocumented immigrants as the Supreme Court considers a DACA case.
New York Daily News › 1 month ago
Those undocumented immigrants — the so-called Dreamers permitted to stay under President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals or DACA — could face deportation if the Supreme Court overturns the policy.They’re planning to kick off...
CBS News › 1 month ago
The Supreme Court will hear arguments that could decide the fate of 700,000 young undocumented immigrants who came to the U.S. as children. The Trump administration is fighting to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as...
Sign In

Sign in to follow sources and tags you love, and get personalized stories.

Continue with Google
OR