Trump allies push back on ‘quid pro quo,’ say envoy testified Ukraine initially unaware of aid holdup

Fox News Politics 3 weeks ago
No impeachment witness has provided testimony that the Ukrainians were aware that U.S. aid was being withheld, says Texas Congressman John Ratcliffe, Republican member of the House Intelligence Committee.

President Trump and his allies in Congress pushed back against damaging revelations from diplomat Bill Taylor’s Tuesday testimony – in which the Ukraine envoy said the administration linked U.S. military aid to a call for politically related investigations in Kiev – saying the witness also acknowledged under questioning that Ukraine was initially in the dark on the aid holdup.

Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, asserted that this counters claims of a “quid pro quo.”

“At the end of the day, this was about quid pro quo and whether or not the Ukrainians were aware that military aid was being withheld and on that most important issue. Neither this witness or any other witness has provided any evidence that there was a quid pro quo, or any evidence that the Ukrainians were aware that military aid was being withheld on July 25,” Ratcliffe said on “The Story” Tuesday night, claiming that absent testimony speaking to that point, “a quid pro quo is legally impossible.”

He was referring to the now-famous phone call on July 25 between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, during which Trump pressed for investigations into 2016 election interference and Biden family dealings in the country, specifically Hunter Biden's role on the board of natural gas firm Burisma Holdings.

A source familiar with the testimony confirmed to Fox News that during questioning on Capitol Hill Tuesday, Taylor said the Ukrainians did not know at the time of the call about the hold on U.S. military aid.

“The mainstream media reporting that he provided evidence of a quid pro quo involving military aid is false — I questioned him directly on that,” Ratcliffe said Tuesday. “I can’t tell you what he said … but I can tell you what he didn’t say — neither he nor any other witness has provided testimony that the Ukrainians were aware that military aid was being withheld.”

He added: “You can’t have a quid pro quo with no quo.”

The president echoed Ratcliffe’s comments on Twitter early Wednesday, quoting from his appearance on Fox News.

"Where is the whistleblower? The Do Nothing Dems case is DEAD!" Trump tweeted.

However, Taylor did testify that he was told U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland informed top Ukrainian aide Andriy Yermak weeks later that “security assistance money would not come until President Zelensky committed to pursue the Burisma investigation.”

Taylor testified that he learned of the Sondland-Yermak conversation during a phone call with National Security Council aide Tim Morrison.

“I was alarmed by what Mr. Morrison told me about the Sondland-Yermak conversation,” Taylor testified. “This was the first time I had heard that the security assistance not just the White House meeting — was conditioned on the investigations.”

So according to Taylor's testimony, the Ukraine government eventually was informed of the apparent reason for the aid delay.

That same day, Taylor said, he sent Sondland a text message asking if security assistance and a White House meeting "are conditioned on investigations," prompting Sondland to request Taylor call him.

"During that phone call, Ambassador Sondland told me that President Trump had told him that he wants President Zelenskyy to state publicly that Ukrain will investigate Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. election," Taylor testified.

Fox News chief political anchor Bret Baier joins Shannon Bream on 'Fox News @ Night.'

“By mid-July it was becoming clear to me that the meeting President Zelensky wanted was conditioned on the investigations of Burisma and alleged Ukrainian interference in the 2016 U.S. elections,” Taylor testified.

Throughout this, Trump still insisted he was not seeking a "quid pro quo."

Taylor's testimony, though, has fueled Democratic criticism amid the impeachment inquiry launched in the House last month over revelations concerning Trump's phone call with Zelensky.

Trump took heat for pressuring the Ukrainian president to launch an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden’s business dealings in Ukraine — concerning Hunter’s role on the board of Burisma Holdings, and Joe Biden's bid to pressure the former Ukrainian president to fire a top prosecutor who was investigating the firm. A whistleblower who first aired the allegations claimed Trump was improperly soliciting foreign aid to investigate a political opponent to ultimately influence the 2020 election.

At the heart of the debate today is whether U.S. military aid was directly tied to these requests.

The president’s request came after millions in U.S. aid to Ukraine had been frozen. But the White House and the president’s allies have denied a quid pro quo – though acting White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney recently seemed to say otherwise, before walking it back – and the Bidens have maintained that they did “nothing wrong.”

Democrats called Taylor's testimony the most damaging yet.

"The testimony is very disturbing," said Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y. Rep. Dean Phillips, D-Minn., used the same word. Asked why, he said, "Because it's becoming more distinct."

But top Republicans cited Ratcliffe’s questioning as a big moment in the hearing that undermined Taylor's argument.

“In 90 seconds, we had John Ratcliffe destroy Taylor’s whole argument,” House GOP Leader Kevin McCarthy said Tuesday in an interview Tuesday on "The Ingraham Angle."

House Intelligence Committee Ranking Member Devin Nunes, D-Calif., echoed the sentiment.

“The truth is, in two minutes, John Ratcliffe destroyed this witness,” Nunes said on “Hannity.” “There is no quid pro quo.”

And Rep. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., said reports of Taylor’s testimony had been “laughably overblown and don’t tell the full story.”

“Still no evidence of quid pro quo. Much of the statement and hearsay allegations didn’t hold up against any real scrutiny. The FULL transcript should be released immediately,” Meadows tweeted.

Meanwhile, Taylor described the existence of an "irregular" communications channel with Ukraine led by Trump's attorney Rudy Giuliani, and a "weird combination of encouraging, confusing, and ultimately alarming circumstances" once he arrived in Kiev. The statement confirmed previous reporting of Taylor's remarks by Fox News.

Fox News' Gregg Re, Chad Pergram, Mike Emanuel, Alex Pappas, and The Associated Press contributed to this report.


Source link
Read also:
Fox News › Politics › 1 month ago
Former U.S. envoy to Ukraine Kurt Volker told lawmakers during closed-door testimony Thursday that the Ukrainians never indicated concerns to him about President Trump pursuing a quid pro quo -- linking military aid to an investigation of Joe Biden...
Breitbart › Politics › 6 days ago
Bill Taylor told impeachment investigators Ukraine did not know the U.S. had temporarily frozen aid on July 25, making quid pro quo impossible
Newsweek › 46 minutes ago
"There was no quid, and there was no quo," Washington Times editor Charles Hurt told Fox & Friends' Steve Doocy. "When there's no quid or pro, you can't keep saying 'quid pro quo,' even though I don't even know what that means, really."
Raw Story › Politics › 2 weeks ago
U.S. Ambassador to the European Union Gordon Sondland testified that there was a quid pro quo between President Donald Trump and Ukraine as the administration sought foreign election assistance, his lawyer revealed to The Wall Street Journal. “Gordon...
Breitbart › Politics › 2 weeks ago
NYT confirmed that there could be no quid pro quo because Ukraine did not know the United States had delayed the release of aid.
Fox News › 1 month ago
A marathon closed-door interview of President Trump's former Ukraine envoy tore apart Democrats' claims of a quid pro quo between the two governments, House Foreign Affairs Committee Member Scott Perry, R-Pa, claimed.
Raw Story › 3 weeks ago
The Ukraine ambassador testified that EU ambassador Gordon Sondland told home that foreign aid was being held up for political reasons. Bill Taylor, the top U.S. diplomat in Ukraine, testified that Sondland revealed to him that military aid to the...
Business Insider › Politics › 1 week ago
GOP Sen. Lindsey Graham is refusing to look at new evidence of a quid pro quo involving President Donald Trump and military aid to Ukraine. In late September, Graham said evidence of Trump withholding military aid from Ukraine in exchange for an...
CNN › Politics › 3 weeks ago
"Quid pro quo," the term you can't escape (let alone pronounce). CNN's Jeanne Moos reports on mangling "quid pro quo."
Breitbart › Politics › 1 week ago
On Sunday's broadcast of NBC's "Meet The Press," Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) said there was no investigation into the Bidens by Ukraine, and they got military aid allocated to them by Congress, so there was no quid pro quo between President Donald Trump and...
Sign In

Sign in to follow sources and tags you love, and get personalized stories.

Continue with Google
OR