Trump's acting ambassador to Ukraine blew apart his 'no quid pro quo' impeachment defense, leaving Republicans to clutch at straws to defend him

Business Insider Politics 3 weeks ago

The closed-doors congressional testimony Tuesday of the top US diplomat to Ukraine could be the development that forces Republicans to totally reassess their defense of President Donald Trump from a swirling impeachment process.

On Tuesday Bill Taylor told the House Intelligence Committee in unambiguous terms that the White House — and its emissaries conducting a shadow foreign policy in Ukraine — had made military aid to the state conditional on an investigation being opened into Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and his son, Hunter. 

He described in detailed terms a quid pro quo arrangement that Trump and Republicans had denied ever took place. The term is a Latin phrase for a favor granted explicitly in return for something else.

(Despite the testimony being held in private, outlets including CNN, The New York Times and The Washington Post obtained his full opening statement.)

He said that Gordon Sondland — the hotel magnate and GOP donor Trump appointed as EU ambassador — told him that "'everything was dependent" on Ukraine announcing a Biden probe, "including security assistance." 

"Our relationship with Ukraine was being fundamentally undermined by an irregular, informal channel of US, policy-making and by the withholding of vital security assistance for domestic political reasons," he told lawmakers. 

Up to that point, top Republicans had mostly stuck to the line that no compelling evidence of a quid pro quo arrangement had emerged — and that there are therefore no grounds for impeaching the president. 

As recently as Saturday, Sen. Lindsey Graham, one of the president's key congressional allies, told Vox News that he had not seen any evidence so far to prove the claim.  

"If you could show me that, you know, Trump actually was engaging in a quid pro quo, outside the phone call, that would be very disturbing," he said — the implication being that he had not yet seen any proof.

The White House briefly appeared to admit a quid pro quo itself.

In a stunning press conference last week, acting chief of staff Mick Mulvaney described a quid pro quo deal, but hastily retracted the comments, blaming the media for misconstruing him.

Taylor's testimony has made it even more difficult for Republicans to maintain the "no quid pro quo" line of defense, and strengthened the hand of Democrats.

Democratic Rep. and House intelligence committee member Debbie Wasserman described it as "the most damning testimony I've heard." 

So what next for Republicans seeking to win the battle for public opinion as the House Democrats' case for impeaching Trump grows stronger?

According to multiple reports, the White House has not formed a "war room" to coordinate the party's response to the inquiry, leaving efforts to hit back at Democrats conducting the probe in disarray even before Taylor's testimony.  

The situation had gotten so bad that, according to Politico, Steve Bannon— the former chief strategist who left the White House on acrimonious terms — is launching a podcast which he wants to act as an informal war room for the Republican defense against impeachment. 

Writing in The Washington Post, correspondent Dan Balz spelled out some of the routes that Republicans might take after Taylor laid bare the shadow foreign policy waged by White House surrogates in Ukraine. 

"Will they conclude that what the president did was legitimate? Will they attempt to point in other directions? Will they argue that what Trump did wasn't right but isn't impeachable? There's less room for equivocation about what happened today than there was before," he wrote. 

The White House's immediate response was to attack Taylor's credibility, as seen by press secretary Stephanie Grisham accusing him of partisan bias, echoing White House attacks on the officials who conducted the Mueller probe.

"This is a co-ordinated smear campaign from far-left lawmakers and radical unelected bureaucrats waging war on the Constitution," Grisham said. 

And in what is likely to cause further concern for the White House, a Reuters/Ipsos poll — taken before Taylor's testimony — shows support among independent voters for impeaching Trump soaring. 

But there was also a clue in the poll showing cause for optimism for Trump.

Despite the official White House line of defense to impeachment being in tatters, Trump still has good reason to believe that Republicans will find a new argument in favor of acquitting him in a prospective Senate impeachment trial.

According to the survey, almost three quarters of Republicans approve of Trump's handling of foreign policy.

This is down from the last survey, but the high levels of support from the party's grassroots will likely deter Republicans considering abandoning their defense of the president altogether. 

Source link
Read also:
NBC News › Politics › 6 hours ago
Taylor describes quid pro quo despite denials of a quid pro quo.
The Inquisitr › Politics › 2 weeks ago
Donald Trump’s request for Ukraine to dig up dirt on political opponent Joe Biden amounted to a quid pro quo, a U.S. ambassador at the center of the impeachment inquiry reportedly told members of Congress. A lawyer for U.S. Ambassador to the European...
Newsweek › 8 hours ago
"There was no quid, and there was no quo," Washington Times editor Charles Hurt told Fox & Friends' Steve Doocy. "When there's no quid or pro, you can't keep saying 'quid pro quo,' even though I don't even know what that means, really."
Reuters › Politics › 3 weeks ago
The U.S. ambassador to the European Union plans to tell the House of Representatives' impeachment inquiry that President Donald Trump told him multiple times that there was no "quid pro quo" with Ukraine.
Fox News › Politics › 1 month ago
The U.S. ambassador to the European Union, Gordon Sondland, is expected to tell congressional lawmakers on Thursday that President Trump told him there was no quid pro quo when it came to Trump’s controversial July phone call with Ukrainian President...
Business Insider › Politics › 1 week ago
Gordon Sondland, the US ambassador to the European Union, became the latest witness in the impeachment inquiry to confirm an explicit quid pro quo between the Trump administration and Ukraine. Sondland confirmed to Congress that the administration...
Axios › Politics › 1 month ago
Sen. Ron Johnson (R.-Wis.) told the Wall Street Journal that he learned of a possible quid pro quo between the Trump administration and Ukraine's government from EU Ambassador Gordon Sondland. The big picture: Johnson said that he pressed President...
Alternet › 1 week ago
Whatever crazy defense House Republicans are mounting of Donald Trump, Senate Republicans are being forced to deal with the reality that he provably engaged in a quid pro quo. Not…
CNN › Politics › 3 weeks ago
"Quid pro quo," the term you can't escape (let alone pronounce). CNN's Jeanne Moos reports on mangling "quid pro quo."
The Week › 5 days ago
Both impeachment witnesses who had their deposition transcripts released Friday mentioned Acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney as being involved in coordinating an alleged quid pro quo with Ukraine. Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, the top Ukraine expert on...
Sign In

Sign in to follow sources and tags you love, and get personalized stories.

Continue with Google