‘It doesn’t matter anymore’: House Republicans pivot to new strategy after quid pro quo confirmed

Raw Story 2 weeks ago

Now that evidence of a quid pro quo arrangement has been established in the impeachment case against President Donald Trump, congressional Republicans are changing their tune.

House Republicans have insisted they would not tolerate the president withholding congressionally approved aid from Ukraine to force an investigation of Joe Biden, but that no longer matters to them after multiple impeachment witnesses described just such a scheme, reported the Washington Examiner.

“Asking people to do something in order to get the foreign aid, that’s a relatively common occurrence with all of our foreign aid,” said Rep. Mike Conaway (R-TX), who sits on the House Intelligence Committee. “You could say all of our foreign aid is quid pro quo.”

Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) confirmed that House Republicans no longer care about the existence of a quid pro quo, after State Department and National Security Council officials have told the House Intelligence Committee that the aid was conditioned to announcing an investigation of Biden.

“It doesn’t matter much anymore,” Cole said.

Trump has denied holding back the aid to pressure Ukraine’s president to announce the investigation, but witness testimony and a call summary released by the White House shows his strong interest in investigating Biden and a conspiracy theory linking Kyiv to 2016 election interference.

“Is there anything about their conversation that merits throwing out the votes of 63 million people?” said Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R-FL). “That’s the bottom line.”

House Republicans have so far dismissed the evidence as second-hand hearsay testimony, but they’re already signaling that first-hand testimony won’t change their minds on impeachment.

“Even if the Democrats’ fact pattern that they’ve laid out turns out to be 100 percent correct, it does not matter,” said a House Republican who requested anonymity. “The law permits the president to withhold money.”

Congressional aides admit the GOP strategy has shifted as the facts began tilting against the president.

“It has gone from, ‘There is no quid pro quo,’ to, ‘there’s a quid and a quo but not a pro,’ to ‘even if there was a quid pro quo, it’s not that bad, this is just how things are done,” one GOP aide said. “You can say it’s bad, but it’s not impeachable.”


Source link
Read also:
NBC News › Politics › 3 weeks ago
Taylor describes quid pro quo despite denials of a quid pro quo.
Newsweek › 3 weeks ago
"There was no quid, and there was no quo," Washington Times editor Charles Hurt told Fox & Friends' Steve Doocy. "When there's no quid or pro, you can't keep saying 'quid pro quo,' even though I don't even know what that means, really."
Washington Examiner › 2 weeks ago
After saying they could not accept a quid pro quo, House Republicans say it no longer matters if President Trump tied $400 million in military aid earmarked for Ukraine to Kyiv agreeing to investigate Democratic rival Joe Biden.
Newsweek › Politics › 2 weeks ago
One Republican representative told The Washington Examiner that any existence of a quid pro quo "doesn't matter much anymore."
CNN › Politics › 1 month ago
"Quid pro quo," the term you can't escape (let alone pronounce). CNN's Jeanne Moos reports on mangling "quid pro quo."
New York Daily News › Politics › 1 week ago
President Trump reportedly was briefed on the intelligence whistleblower report on Ukraine days before he emphatically denied a “quid pro quo" between restoring suspended aid and the launch of partisan investigations aimed at Democrats.
Alternet › 1 month ago
Whatever crazy defense House Republicans are mounting of Donald Trump, Senate Republicans are being forced to deal with the reality that he provably engaged in a quid pro quo. Not…
Breitbart › Politics › 1 month ago
NYT confirmed that there could be no quid pro quo because Ukraine did not know the United States had delayed the release of aid.
The Inquisitr › Politics › 1 month ago
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff said on Sunday that “there doesn’t need to be a quid pro quo” agreement between President Donald Trump and the Ukrainian government for impeachment to move forward, RealClearPolitics reports...
New York Daily News › Politics › 1 month ago
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy insisted Friday that Mick Mulvaney was “very clear” while making confusing comments about President Trump’s quid pro quo with Ukraine, even as other Republicans acknowledged the top White House aide had...
Sign In

Sign in to follow sources and tags you love, and get personalized stories.

Continue with Google
OR