Conservative Newspaper Editor Tells Fox News Host There Was No 'Quid Pro Quo' Before Admitting He Doesn't Know What Phrase Means

Newsweek 3 weeks ago

Charles Hurt, the opinion editor for conservative outlet The Washington Times, went on Fox & Friends Wednesday morning and repeated the "There was no quid pro quo" mantra of President Donald Trump's supporters thus far in the impeachment inquiry. However, right after saying there is "no quid pro quo," Hurt admitted, "I don't know even know what that means, really."

Ahead of the start of public impeachment hearings Wednesday, Hurt spoke to Fox & Friends host Steve Doocy to defend Trump. Hurt stated that the language that Democrats are using to describe Trump's actions is born out of the president's innocence. He said, "When you hear Adam Schiff and Democrats use all these squirrelly words like 'quid pro quo,' 'bribery,' all these things, it's all because they can't specify exactly where Donald Trump broke any law or did anything particularly wrong."

Hurt then quickly demonstrated the gap in his understanding of the phrase, which has been in the news for the past month. "There was no quid, and there was no quo," he told Doocy. "When there's no quid or pro, you can't keep saying 'quid pro quo,' even though I don't even know what that means, really." Before Doocy cut him off, the editor also noted, "I don't know what language 'quid pro quo' is."

Trump Charles Hurt

Doocy jumped in to inform Hurt that the phrase is Latin. "It's Latin to everybody," he added, implying that the phrase is incomprehensible.

"Quid pro quo" is a legal term that translates roughly "tit for tat," or "something for something. The legality of quid pro quo agreements varies by the circumstances such arrangements. If the president is found by Congress to have withheld federal aid to Ukraine on the condition that the country publicly announce an investigation into his political opponent, as House Democrats have alleged, such an action would represent an abuse of executive power and an impeachable offense.

As Wednesday's impeachment draws closer, the quid pro quo conversation has centered on a July phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in which the president told his Ukrainian counterpart "I would like you to do us a favor," and went on to encourage the newly elected official to investigate Democratic front-runner former Vice President Joe Biden. Closed-door testimony from various representatives who listened in on the phone call and who were familiar with U.S. policy in Ukraine has supported the whistleblower complaint of inappropriate dealings by the president.

The nature of the deal has stirred many commentators to weigh in on the cases for and against Trump. A Fox News judicial analyst stated that Trump's deal with the Ukrainian president was "clearly impeachable" Tuesday night.

The impeachment hearing will begin at 10 a.m. ET on Wednesday morning.

Source link
Read also:
NBC News › Politics › 3 weeks ago
Taylor describes quid pro quo despite denials of a quid pro quo.
Fox News › 1 month ago
Fox News contributor Ken Starr said on Friday that acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney was “pretty close” to admitting President Trump’s phone call with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenksy did involve a “quid pro quo.”
The Daily Beast › Politics › 1 month ago
Fox News attempted to help “acting” White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney clean up his admission of a “quid pro quo” with Ukraine, but Fox & Friends Weekend host and reporter Ed Henry wasn’t quite ready to let him off the hook.After...
New York Daily News › Politics › 1 week ago
President Trump reportedly was briefed on the intelligence whistleblower report on Ukraine days before he emphatically denied a “quid pro quo" between restoring suspended aid and the launch of partisan investigations aimed at Democrats.
Breitbart › Politics › 2 weeks ago
During Thursday's special coverage of the House Intelligence Committee's impeachment inquiry on the Fox News Channel, "Fox News Sunday" host Chris Wallace said all the witnesses said, "that there was a quid pro quo." | Clips
CNN › Politics › 1 month ago
"Quid pro quo," the term you can't escape (let alone pronounce). CNN's Jeanne Moos reports on mangling "quid pro quo."
ABC News › Politics › 0 month ago
Everything you need to know about the allegations against President Donald Trump, his defense, and why the phrase “quid pro quo” is dominating the debate.
Sputnik International › 1 month ago
Former White House communications director Jen Psaki criticized White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney for admitting to a “quid pro quo” in Trump’s talk with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, yet conceded that it is a common tactic for...
CNN › Politics › 1 month ago
White House adviser Kellyanne Conway could not definitively say to CNN's Dana Bash whether or not there was a quid pro quo involving President Donald Trump and military aid to Ukraine, saying "I don't know whether aid was being held up and for how long...
Breitbart › Politics › 1 month ago
NYT confirmed that there could be no quid pro quo because Ukraine did not know the United States had delayed the release of aid.
Sign In

Sign in to follow sources and tags you love, and get personalized stories.

Continue with Google