“Trading strategies that exploit [non-recurring] earnings produce abnormal returns of 7-to-10% per year.”
– “Core Earnings: New Data and Evidence”
In “Core Earnings: New Data and Evidence”, Ethan Rouen and Charles C.Y. Wang of Harvard Business School (HBS) and Eric So of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) Sloan School of Management show that:
- Markets are inefficiently assessing earnings because no one reads the footnotes.
- New technology brings this material footnotes data to the market for the first time ever.
In this report, I leverage my Robo-Analyst technology and “novel dataset” to highlight a tech giant that is significantly more profitable than its earnings suggest. Qualcomm (QCOM) is this week’s Long Idea.
GAAP Earnings Mislead Investors
GAAP earnings are distorted by non-recurring income and expenses, as well as a number of loopholes that allow executives to “manage” (i.e. manipulate) earnings.
Non-GAAP earnings are even worse. When companies get to make their own rules, they regularly exclude operating expenses to overstate earnings.
My firm solves this problem by combining machine learning technology with human expertise to comb through every 10-K and 10-Q for over 2,800 companies to create an unrivalled dataset of non-recurring expenses and income. As the HBS paper attests:
“…this is the most comprehensive dataset that captures what a fundamental analyst would be likely to identify as transitory or non-operating earnings items…”
My analysis of QCOM’s most recent 10-K reveals nearly $3.9 billion (12% of total assets and $3.17 per share) in net non-recurring expenses. On a trailing twelve months (TTM) basis, QCOM had $2.1 billion (6% of total assets) in net non-recurring expenses.
Below I’ll walk through the adjustments I made to QCOM’s 10-K that are used to calculate Core Earnings featured in the HBS paper. The formula for Core Earnings is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: The Formula for Core Earnings
Net Acquisition Expenses
QCOM disclosed $782 million (2% of total assets) in net acquisition expenses in 2018.
These non-recurring expenses, disclosed on page 41 of the financial footnotes (page 109 overall), were classified as follows:
- $449 million in cost of revenues (4% of total cost of revenues)
- $6 million in research and development expenses (<1% of research and development expense)
- $327 in selling, general, and administrative expenses (11% of SG&A)
Net Currency Expenses
QCOM disclosed a net gain of $37 million (<1% of total assets) on foreign currency transactions in 2018.
This foreign currency gain was disclosed on page 20 of the financial footnotes (page 88 overall).
Net Discontinued Operations Expense
QCOM did not disclose any discontinued operations expenses in 2018.
Net Legal Expenses
QCOM did not disclose any legal expenses in 2018.
Net Pension Adjustments
QCOM did not disclose any pension adjustments in 2018.
Net Restructuring Expenses
QCOM disclosed a net gain of $49 million (<1% of total assets) on restructuring items in 2018.
This net gain, disclosed on page 20 of the financial footnotes (page 88 overall), consists of:
- $124 million in realized gains on marketable securities and other investments, partially offset by
- $75 million in impairment losses on marketable securities and other investments
Net Company-Defined Other Expenses
QCOM disclosed $3.1 billion (10% of total assets) in company-defined other expenses on its income statement in 2018.
By far the largest component of QCOM’s “Other Expenses” was the $2 billion breakup fee it paid as part of its failed merger with NXP Semiconductors. The company incurred this charge in Q4 2018, which means the fine still impacts TTM earnings.
Net Other Expenses
QCOM disclosed $27 million (<1% of total assets) in other expenses that I classified as non-recurring in 2018.
This expense consisted of $27 million in losses on derivative instruments, disclosed on page 20 of the financial footnotes (page 88 overall).
But Wait… There’s More
In addition to the adjustments made to calculate “Core Earnings” in the HBS paper, I identified one other significant adjustment. On page 21 of the financial footnotes (page 89 overall), QCOM disclosed $5.7 billion (17% of total assets) in charges due to U.S. tax reform.
The authors of the HBS paper did not include my tax adjustments, so this item is not included in their analysis. However, at 17% of total assets and $4.67 per share, it clearly had a significant impact on QCOM’s 2018 GAAP earnings, and it continues to impact the company’s TTM earnings.
Figure 2 shows that QCOM’s GAAP net income remains significantly below its net operating profit after tax (NOPAT).
Figure 2: QCOM NOPAT vs. GAAP: 2015-TTM
My analysis shows that QCOM’s GAAP net income significantly understates the company’s true profitability.
High Quality Corporate Governance
In addition to its understated earnings, Qualcomm’s corporate governance is impressive. The company ties ~25% of total executive compensation to 3-year average return on invested capital (ROIC). ROIC is the best metric for aligning executive’s interests with those of long-term shareholders because it has the clearest link to valuation, and it incentivizes executives to be responsible stewards of shareholder capital.
Numerous case studies show that getting ROIC right is an important part of making smart investments. This paper compares my firm’s analytics on a mega cap company to other major providers. The Appendix details exactly how we stack up. The technology that enables this research is featured by Harvard Business School.
Per Figure 3, ROIC explains 52% of the difference in valuation for the 16 large cap semiconductor companies we cover. QCOM trades at a discount to peers as shown by its position below the trend line.
Figure 3: ROIC Explains 52% of Valuation for QCOM Peers
If QCOM were to trade at parity with its peers, the stock would be worth $111/share today, a 42% upside to the current stock price.
My reverse discounted cash flow model reveals the stock has significant upside potential as well. If QCOM can maintain its 2018 NOPAT margin of 20%, and grow NOPAT by 7% compounded annually over the next decade (in-line with its growth rate over the past 10 years), the stock is worth $91/share today, a 16% upside to the current stock price. See the math behind this dynamic DCF scenario.
Exploit Market Inefficiency
The HBS paper clearly shows an inefficiency in the market. The paper’s abstract states:
“Analysts and market participants are slow to impound the implications of transitory earnings.”
My firm’s research gives investors the ability to identify these transitory earnings and find companies, like QCOM, that are more profitable than would first appear and are undervalued.
Disclosure: David Trainer, Kyle Guske II, and Sam McBride receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, style, or theme.
 From page 1 of the paper: “Some components of earnings reported in firms’ 10Ks and 10Qs are likely persistent over time, stemming the core operations of the firm, whereas others reflect transitory shocks and are unlikely to persist.”